yet another lie by Joan/Doris

I just left this comment on the following

http://ladymoondancersrealm.blogspot.com/2018/04/antoher-nonsense-statement-lie-from.html

Obviously to anyone who REALLY knows Joan/Doris and the TRUTH of our family, Joan/Doris is putting her own spin on things…again! reason? Because she needs attention and sympathy.

She says at the beginning of her post…‘Ok, I can somewhat talk about this now, after a few anxiety-filled days.’ First, every day in her life is ANXIETY FILLED! But...March is always a bad month for her (adoptive mother died March 11 and natural mother died March 28). So here she starts by laying the ground work for ATTENTION AND SYMPATHY. She’s playing to a selective group, fellow adoptees who believe her version without question.

She says at the end of her post… ‘Just one more reason why I am an ethical atheist.’ Joan/Doris is not ethical in anything! For her to continue to spread lies about our mother and father to promote her HATRED of adoption is certainly NOT ethical, by any MORAL philosophy. Truth is Joan/Doris has NO moral compass.

She says…’Oh, and the story gets even better! When I first met my father in 1974 (Senior year of high school), he showed me my natural mother's high school diploma. Yup, Signed by Joseph Schieder, circa 1942. He was a fledgling priest back then.’

Joan/Doris KNOWS how to bait people into listening to her and then she tugs on the line to maintain their attention…that’s the meaning of ‘oh, and the story gets better!’ Her selective closed audience already KNOWS her story and NOW Joan/Doris CAN add another juicy sex scandal on to things!

NOTE, she says ‘he showed me my natural mother's high school diploma’…that means that she DOES NOT have the document and that gives her opportunity to PRESENT whatever spin on it that she wants! NOTE that she states ‘circa 1942’…that indicates that she is GUESSING at the date, attempting to make her story ‘presentable’ and ‘believable’ to people who have NO REASON to doubt what she says. But she can’t prove her statement can she? For there WAS NO high school diploma for our mother because she NEVER GRADUATED. Joan/Doris is using the date of 1942 with the ‘assumption’ that in that year mother would have been 17, the general age that one would graduation from high school! But AGAIN, she didn’t graduate in 42 or any other year. And she HAD to make sure to cover that the priest in question was ‘fledgling priest back then’ to make her story feasible.

I DEMAND proof from Joan/Doris of her accusations.